Coffee Drinkers Live Longer Lives – Food Product Design

ROCKVILLE, Md.?New research published in the New England Journal of Medicine suggests people who drink two to three cups of coffee a day have a 10% to 13% longer life expectancy compared to those who don?t imbibe in a cup o? joe.

The 13-year study was conducted by researchers at the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute and National Institutes of Health. They examined the association of drinking coffee with subsequent total and cause-specific mortality among 229,119 men and 173,141 women in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. Participants were 50 to 71 years old at baseline; those with cancer, heart disease and stroke were excluded.

During the 13-year follow-up, 33,731 men and 18,784 women died. After adjusting for age-related factors, they found that risks for death were elevated for coffee drinkers compared with those who did not drink coffee. They also found coffee drinkers also were more likely to be smokers.

Men who consumed 6 cups or more of coffee daily were 10% less likely to die during the study period compared to men who did not drink coffee. Women who drank 6 cups or more a day had a 15% reduction in mortality. Compared to those who drank no coffee, men who had 2 or 3 cups daily were 10% less likely to die at any age; women had a 13% reduction in risk.

Interestingly, even 1 cup of coffee a day lowered risk by 6% in men and 5% in women. The strongest effect was in women who consumed 4 or 5 cups a day?they had a 16% lower risk of death.

Inverse associations were observed for deaths due to heart disease, respiratory disease, stroke, injuries and accidents, diabetes, and infections, but not for deaths due to cancer. Results were similar in subgroups, including persons who had never smoked and persons who reported very good to excellent health at baseline.

Results of the study support a previous study conducted at UCLA that found women who drink at least 4 cups of coffee a day are less than half as likely to develop diabetes as non-coffee drinkers.

aipac vanessa minnillo lenny dykstra super tuesday epidemiology

McNamee admits his story about Clemens changed

By FREDERIC J. FROMMER

updated 6:22 p.m. ET May 17, 2012

WASHINGTON – During another seven grueling hours of cross-examination that frustrated all sides, Roger Clemens’ accuser explained the evidence he kept in a beer can – and why his story about it has changed.

Brian McNamee was on the stand Thursday for a fourth day in the perjury trial of the seven-time Cy Young Award-winning pitcher, holding firm to his testimony that he injected Clemens with steroids from 1998 to 2001 and human growth hormone in 2000.

But Clemens’ longtime strength coach again conceded that his memory of some details has evolved over the years, and that he initially told some lies during the drugs-in-baseball investigation conducted by federal agents and former Sen. George Mitchell.

Whether the jurors were still keeping track is another matter: They again expressed concern about the agonizingly slow pace of a trial that still has weeks to go, and the judge opined that Clemens’ lawyer was “confusing everybody.”

“At this pace,” U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton said, “I’ll guess we’ll be here forever.”

Clemens lawyer Rusty Hardin tried to exploit McNamee’s inconsistencies, even if it meant taking the case far afield from the principle issue of whether Clemens actually used performance-enhancing drugs. The former baseball star is accused of lying when he testified to Congress in 2008 that he never used steroids or HGH.

The day’s testimony ended at a tantalizing moment. After some 19 hours on the stand, McNamee was being challenged by Hardin over the needle and other waste kept in a Miller Lite can after a steroids injection McNamee said he gave Clemens in 2001. The government is expected to show the waste contains Clemens’ DNA.

McNamee indicated to Congress in 2008 that he kept the evidence primarily because he was starting to distrust Clemens, but he told the jury earlier this week he kept it because his wife had starting nagging him to do something to protect himself from being a fall guy in case he ever got caught.

McNamee said Thursday he had hoped to keep his wife out of the story. His change of heart came as he and his wife are going through a contentious divorce.

“Now she’s involved,” McNamee said, “she’s got to take responsibility for her action.”

McNamee said the beer can came from the recycling bin in Clemens’ apartment, while conceding that he’d never seen Clemens drink a light beer. Hardin insinuated that McNamee manufactured the evidence after Clemens’ televised denials of steroids use.

“All of a sudden, the person being accused is fighting back,” Hardin said, “and you have to figure out some way to save yourself.”

Hardin’s aim is to portray McNamee as a serial liar, and he appeared to have some success this day.

“Did you ever tell Sen. Mitchell that you injected Roger Clemens approximately four times in the rear over a two-week period in 1998?” Hardin asked.

“That’s possible,” McNamee answered.

“If you did tell him … would that be a lie?” Hardin asked.

“Yes, it would,” said McNamee, who testified this week that he injected Clemens about eight to 10 times during Clemens’ 1998 season with the Toronto Blue Jays.

McNamee again maintained that he had minimized the number of shots to try to help out Clemens.

“I wanted to make it not look like he was a bigger steroids user than he was. … I never lied about the usage, just amounts,” he said.

There were several similar exchanges. Hardin also displayed a calendar to show that a 1998 pool party at former slugger Jose Canseco’s house was on a Tuesday; McNamee has always remembered it taking place on a Saturday. McNamee then went back and forth trying to place the date he gave Clemens’ wife an HGH shot at the Clemens’ home in Texas – switching from the 2003-04 offseason to the 2002-03 offseason.

“I could be confused,” McNamee said. “I’m getting handed a lot of dates.”

But it’s an open question whether the lawyer’s scattershot approach – leapfrogging from topic to topic with complex questions that evoke frequent objections from the government – will pay dividends with the jury. A serious trial that could end up sending one of baseball’s all-time greats to prison was peppered with exchanges Thursday that sounded more like a situation comedy.

There was one exchange in which Hardin wanted to know why McNamee didn’t tip off Clemens after being contacted by federal authorities. McNamee said Clemens never asked.

Hardin: “How could he ask if he didn’t know?”

McNamee: “How could I answer if he didn’t ask?”

Hardin: “You’re serious?”

At another point, when Hardin was switching topics at a fast and furious pace, McNamee turned his palms up and said: “You’re going from articles to emails – I’m trying to keep up, man.”

Later, as Hardin was trying to pin another lie on him, McNamee responded: “I’m having a problem with the `lie’ thing.”

Then, when explaining why he decided to cooperate with federal authorities, McNamee said: “They would have had an opportunity to lock me up for lying.” But Hardin mistook McNamee’s thick New York accent, thinking McNamee said “life” instead of “lying.” Hardin started to make a big deal of the comment until McNamee corrected him.

The sputtering pace of the trial, now in its fifth week, is taking a noticeable toll on the jury. Two members of the panel already have been dismissed for sleeping, leaving 12 jurors and two alternates. Walton emerged from a morning break and said they’ve been asking again how long the trial will last.

Walton sounded incredulous when the government responded that it had 14 more witnesses to call, which would bring its total to 26. The judge then told the jury that he expects the trial to last through at least June 8.

With the jury out of earshot, the judge said “someone’s going to pay the price” for the slow pace, but Walton said he couldn’t tell which side it would be. Then he segued into a critique of Hardin’s all-over-the-place questioning.

“It’s confusing everybody,” Walton said, “but I don’t think it’s making much of a point.”

? 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

advertisement

More newsGetty Images

Sounding off about the umps

HBT: Red Sox slugger Adrian Gonzalez is not happy with the state of umpiring today, saying it’s hard to ‘have a professional at-bat.’

platypus

Pot groups hope Ore. race sends feds a message (The Arizona Republic)

Gupta insider trading jury to hear Rajaratnam tapes

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Convicted hedge fund founder Raj Rajaratnam is in prison, but the jurors of a separate insider trading trial of former Goldman Sachs Group Inc and Procter & Gamble Co board member Rajat Gupta will hear his voice in court on FBI wiretaps.

A federal judge in New York made a preliminary ruling on Wednesday to allow prosecutors to play a recorded telephone conversation from July 29, 2008, between Rajaratnam and Gupta, whose trial starts next Monday.

Over defense objections, U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff said the 24 minute-long call was relevant as the “one and only direct evidence of the telephone relationship between Mr. Rajaratnam and Mr. Gupta.

“It shows the nature of the relationship even if there is nothing improper on the call,” Rakoff said at the final pre-trial hearing.

Gupta, the most prominent corporate figure indicted in a U.S. government crackdown on insider trading at hedge funds in recent years, is heard telling Rajaratnam that the Goldman board discussed the firm’s possible interest in acquiring a commercial bank or insurance giant American International Group Inc .

The information is not included in the charges against Gupta. His main lawyer, Gary Naftalis, argued that Gupta was “basically confirming a rumor” and Goldman customers, including hedge funds, already knew about it from the firm’s executives.

Galleon Group hedge fund founder Rajaratnam, 53, was convicted a year ago on evidence largely based on court-approved wiretaps of his phones. He is appealing the use of wiretaps as he serves an 11-year prison term, the longest handed down for insider trading in the United States.

Gupta, 63, was charged last October with five counts of securities fraud and one count of conspiracy, allegations he denies. His trial is expected to last three weeks. If convicted, he could face up to 25 years in prison.

The first witness to be called on Monday or Tuesday will be former Galleon secretary Karyn Eisenberg, U.S. prosecutor Reed Brodsky said in court on Wednesday.

Prosecutors accuse the former corporate board member – he also led the McKinsey & Co consultancy for nine years – of giving Rajaratnam information from Goldman and Procter & Gamble Co board meetings in 2007 and 2008. In addition to sitting on the Goldman board, Gupta also was a director at P&G.

Gupta contends he lost money investing with Rajaratnam and that as many as four other Goldman personnel could have tipped off Galleon with the company’s confidential information.

RAJARATNAM CALLS WITH TRADERS

At Wednesday’s hearing, the judge also gave tentative approval to prosecutors to present three telephone call recordings between Rajaratnam and two Galleon traders in September and October 2008.

Rakoff said the ruling was not final. He said the three calls “are admissible subject to connection in furtherance of the alleged conspiracy between Mr. Gupta and Mr. Rajaratnam.”

The judge said the government runs the risk that, if the connection is not made, there is potential for a mistrial. During the trial, Gupta’s lawyers have the right to ask the judge to exclude government evidence.

Two of the three phone calls the government wants admitted at trial were between Rajaratnam and his principal trader, Ian Horowitz on September 23, 2008. The other was with portfolio manager David Lau on October 23. There are no recordings of phone conversations between Gupta and Rajaratnam on those dates.

Gupta’s lawyers argue that the evidence against him is circumstantial. Defense lawyer Naftalis argued that toll records show brief phone connections between Gupta and Rajaratnam.

“There may not even have been a conversation,” Naftalis said in court on Wednesday. “We are dealing with speculation upon speculation here.”

Prosecutors say Gupta gave Rajaratnam advance knowledge of a $5 billion investment in Goldman by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc

at the height of the 2008 financial crisis, Goldman’s surprise fourth-quarter 2008 loss and P&G’s quarterly earnings in late January 2009. The government also accused Gupta of providing non-public information about Smucker’s acquisition of Folgers from P&G in June 2008.

The case is USA v. Gupta, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 11-907.

(Editing by Andre Grenon)

full moon amber rose aubrey o day masters live johan santana viktor bout ncaa hockey

DUClarion: The men?s lacrosse team will make its second consecutive appearance in the NCAA quarterfinals this weekend… http://t.co/IGYng7Xb

Loader The men?s lacrosse team will make its second consecutive appearance in the NCAA quarterfinals this weekend…

veep los angeles kings earth day timothy leary jonathan frid pujols watchmen

Bret Michaels settles case over 2009 Tonys mishap

FILE – In this Saturday, Jan. 15, 2011 file photo, Rock and Roll artist Brett Michaels warms up before an NFL divisional playoff football game between the Pittsburgh Steelers and Baltimore Ravens in Pittsburgh. Michaels? attorney announced Monday May 14, 2012 that the rocker had reached a confidential settlement in his lawsuit against the Tony Awards that claimed a set mishap nearly cost him his life in 2009. He was hit in the head by a set piece during the awards show and for months contended with brain bleeding and other effects of the injury. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File)

FILE – In this Saturday, Jan. 15, 2011 file photo, Rock and Roll artist Brett Michaels warms up before an NFL divisional playoff football game between the Pittsburgh Steelers and Baltimore Ravens in Pittsburgh. Michaels? attorney announced Monday May 14, 2012 that the rocker had reached a confidential settlement in his lawsuit against the Tony Awards that claimed a set mishap nearly cost him his life in 2009. He was hit in the head by a set piece during the awards show and for months contended with brain bleeding and other effects of the injury. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File)

(AP) ? Bret Michaels and organizers of the Tony Awards have settled a lawsuit filed by the rocker after a 2009 incident in which he was hit in the head with a set piece and suffered injuries that he claimed contributed to a brain hemorrhage that nearly killed him.

The confidential settlement also covers Michaels’ claims against CBS Broadcasting, which aired the show and the mishap. The Poison frontman blamed the network for airing the moment, which became which a viral video watched by tens of millions of people online, and claimed Tony Awards producers never warned him there would be a set change after he and his band performed “Nothin’ But a Good Time.”

The whack initially left Michaels with a busted lip and broken nose but also caused brain bleeding, the lawsuit claimed. He was hospitalized in April 2010, and doctors found he had a brain hemorrhage and he later suffered a warning stroke, which the musician says nearly killed him.

Michaels’ attorney Alex Weingarten said details of the settlement would not be released. “Mr. Michaels would like to thank his fans for their continued support,” he wrote in a statement.

Michaels sued in March 2011 in Los Angeles, but a judge later moved the case to New York City. The agreement came after a mediation session was held on Friday.

Representatives for CBS and the Tonys released a joint statement saying that “an amicable resolution” had been reached but no further details would be released.

The musician and reality television star did not state how much compensation he was seeking when he sued but said the injury hurt his ability to perform at later shows.

Associated Press

mexico news the talented mr ripley weather new orleans orcl the hartford illinois primary 2012 michael bay

We have found a witch, may we burn her? (Unqualified Offerings)

Hall of mirrors (Powerlineblog)

New Google+ iPhone App Looks So Good, You?ll Wish You Actually Used Google+

On Wednesday afternoon, Google rolled out an update to its Google+ iPhone app. The revamped, redesigned app now looks so stunning it may make you wish the social network itself wasn’t such a ghost town.

pi white lion mike d antoni resigns holes ncaa brackets 2012 odd lamar

Obama threatens to veto Republican’s shield of defense cuts (reuters)